The Celebrity Quarterback Loses Super Bowl

Tom Brady played great at times but he lost.

He had a record 16 straight completions in the first half. He was on his game. Celebrity quarterback Tom Brady (see post Celebrity vs Non-Celebrity) was playing great. So was the Non-Celebrity Eli Manning, but in the biggest game at the most important time, Eli Manning came up with a shockingly brilliant pass to Mario Manningham on the side line. It was a pass so special that people will be talking about it and reviewing it as long as they play professional football. 

Tom Brady couldn't come up with a similar play.   
He actually was slightly off throwing behind league #1 receiver Wes Welker at the end. Ordinarily Wes Walker catches that ball, this one he dropped. Had it been on target no way does it get dropped. And of course on the next play another star receiver, tight end Aaron Hernandez inexplicably dropped a perfect wide open pass and so there’s really no blame you can put on Brady. But there were other questionable throws when a great pass could have made a big difference. When the Patriots desperately needed the great play, when the receiver was there to make that play…the perfect pass never came. Brady has a history of delivering in the clutch, but not this time. Odd.

There’s “no blame” for Brady but there’s also no spectacular miracle pass to win the game either.  
There is no way you can say this is the reason the Patriots lost but it is worth noting because it highlights the fine line between winning and losing. Usually the big games are won by a great play, not by just having a “no blame” game. The quarterback is the key player and the pressure is certainly on him when time is running out and the game is one the line. For whatever reason, this time the non-celebrity quarterback came up with one of those plays and the celebrity quarterback didn’t. Was that the reason the Giants won? I don’t know but there’s no question it was a factor.

The fine line.
Football games have so many players, so many plays, so many variables that anybody’s theory can sound plausible as to why one team wins and the other team loses. But it points out clearly how hard you’ve got to work, how hard you’ve got to prepare, and how hard you’ve got to perform to reach the top.  Any little thing can make the difference.

You see it in other sports as well
That’s why there was only a fraction of an inch difference between winning and losing in 2 of the 8 races at the last Olympics where swimming hero Michael Phelps won his 8 gold medals. Recently, Novak Djokovic just barely edged out Rafael Nadal after a spectacular, intense, five hour finals tennis match at the Australian open. One bounce of the ball after 5 hours of intense competition—and one wins—the other loses.  

That’s why some people would always pick a non-celebrity over a celebrity.  
They realize that to win, no matter how talented they are, they’re going to have to give it everything they’ve got because there’s such a fine line of difference between mediocrity and greatness. It doesn’t matter how famous they are or how many times they’ve won before.

In any given game it comes down to who is the best prepared and wants it most. 
If you are choosing between a celebrity and a non-celebrity, some think that the non-celebrity is the one who is likely to be the hungriest. They think that the non-celebrity also is the one most likely to have the fewest distractions, to have the most focus and to be the most willing to all the non glamorous and painstaking grinding and grunt work needed to be the best prepared. Even if the celebrity only cuts corners slightly or is only slightly less focused, that could be enough to make a difference. The difference shows up when the intensity is the highest. 

Was that the difference in this Super Bowl? You tell me. 

---

Related Posts

Celebrities Vs Non-Celebrities In The Super Bowl
Tom Coughlin, The People’s Coach
The Winning Edge Is Razor Thin